Friday, September 28, 2018

No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header

use dataType: 'jsonp', works for me.


   
       async function get_ajax_data(){
           var _reprojected_lat_lng = await $.ajax({
                                    type: 'GET',
                                    dataType: 'jsonp',
                                    data: {},
                                    url: _reprojection_url,
                                    error: function (jqXHR, textStatus, errorThrown) {
                                        console.log(jqXHR)
                                    },
                                    success: function (data) {
                                        console.log(data);
                                       
                                        // note: data is already json type, you just specify dataType: jsonp
                                        return data;
                                    }
                                });


     } // function             









another way use fetch() not easy. bad solution

================================================================


https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43871637/no-access-control-allow-origin-header-is-present-on-the-requested-resource-whe


247down voteaccepted
This answer covers a lot of ground, so it’s divided into three parts:
  • How to avoid the CORS preflight
  • How to use a CORS proxy to get around “No Access-Control-Allow-Origin header” problems
  • How to fix “Access-Control-Allow-Origin header must not be the wildcard” problems

How to avoid the CORS preflight
The code in the question triggers a CORS preflight—since it sends an Authorization header.
Even without that, the Content-Type: application/json header would also trigger the preflight.
What “preflight” means: before the browser tries the POST in the code in the question, it’ll first send an OPTIONS request to the server — to determine if the server is opting-in to receiving a cross-origin POST that includes the Authorization and Content-Type: application/json headers.
It works pretty well with a small curl script - I get my data.
To properly test with curl, you need to emulate the preflight OPTIONS request the browser sends:
curl -i -X OPTIONS -H "Origin: http://127.0.0.1:3000" \
    -H 'Access-Control-Request-Method: POST' \
    -H 'Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type, Authorization' \
    "https://the.sign_in.url"
…with https://the.sign_in.url replaced by whatever your actual sign_in URL is.
The response the browser needs to see from that OPTIONS request must include headers like this:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin:  http://127.0.0.1:3000
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type, Authorization
If the OPTIONS response doesn’t include those headers, then the browser will stop right there and never even attempt to send the POST request. Also, the HTTP status code for the response must be a 2xx—typically 200 or 204. If it’s any other status code, the browser will stop right there.
The server in the question is responding to the OPTIONS request with a 501 status code, which apparently means it’s trying to indicate it doesn’t implement support for OPTIONS requests. Other servers typically respond with a 405 “Method not allowed” status code in this case.
So you’re never going to be able to make POST requests directly to that server from your frontend JavaScript code if the server responds to that OPTIONS request with a 405 or 501 or anything other than a 200 or 204 or if doesn’t respond with those necessary response headers.
The way to avoid triggering a preflight for the case in the question would be:
  • if the server didn’t require an Authorization request header but instead (for example) relied on authentication data embedded in the body of the POST request or as a query parameter
  • if the server didn’t require the POST body to have a Content-Type: application/json media type but instead accepted the POST body as application/x-www-form-urlencoded with a parameter named json (or whatever) whose value is the JSON data

How to use a CORS proxy to get around “No Access-Control-Allow-Origin header” problems
If you don’t control the server your frontend JavaScript code is sending a request to, and the problem with the response from that server is just the lack of the necessary Access-Control-Allow-Origin header, you can still get things to work—by making the request through a CORS proxy. To show how that works, first here’s some code that doesn’t use a CORS proxy:
const url = "https://example.com"; // site that doesn’t send Access-Control-*
fetch(url)
.then(response => response.text())
.then(contents => console.log(contents))
.catch(() => console.log("Can’t access " + url + " response. Blocked by browser?"))

The reason the catch block gets hit there is, the browser prevents that code from accessing the response which comes back from https://example.com. And the reason the browser does that is, the response lacks the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header.
Now, here’s exactly the same example but just with a CORS proxy added in:
const proxyurl = "https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/";
const url = "https://example.com"; // site that doesn’t send Access-Control-*
fetch(proxyurl + url) // https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/https://example.com
.then(response => response.text())
.then(contents => console.log(contents))
.catch(() => console.log("Can’t access " + url + " response. Blocked by browser?"))

Note: If https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com is down or unavailable when you try it, then see below for how to deploy your own CORS Anywhere server at Heroku in just 2-3 minutes.
The second code snippet above can access the response successfully because taking the request URL and changing it to https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/https://example.com—by just prefixing it with the proxy URL—causes the request to get made through that proxy, which then:
  1. Forwards the request to https://example.com.
  2. Receives the response from https://example.com.
  3. Adds the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to the response.
  4. Passes that response, with that added header, back to the requesting frontend code.
The browser then allows the frontend code to access the response, because that response with the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header is what the browser sees.
You can easily run your own proxy using code from https://github.com/Rob--W/cors-anywhere/.
You can also easily deploy your own proxy to Heroku in literally just 2-3 minutes, with 5 commands:
git clone https://github.com/Rob--W/cors-anywhere.git
cd cors-anywhere/
npm install
heroku create
git push heroku master
After running those commands, you’ll end up with your own CORS Anywhere server running at, e.g., https://cryptic-headland-94862.herokuapp.com/. So then rather than prefixing your request URL with https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com, prefix it instead with the URL for your own instance; e.g., https://cryptic-headland-94862.herokuapp.com/https://example.com.
So if when you go to try to use https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com, you find it’s down(which it sometimes will be), then consider getting a Heroku account (if you don’t already) and take 2 or 3 minutes to do the steps above to deploy your own CORS Anywhere server on Heroku.
Regardless, whether you run your own or use https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com or other open proxy, this solution will work even if the request is one that triggers browsers to do a CORS preflight OPTIONS request—because in that case, the proxy also sends back the Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods headers needed to make the preflight successful.

How to fix “Access-Control-Allow-Origin header must not be the wildcard” problems
I am getting another error message:
The value of the 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header in the response must not be the wildcard '*' when the request's credentials mode is 'include'. Origin 'http://127.0.0.1:3000' is therefore not allowed access. The credentials mode of requests initiated by the XMLHttpRequest is controlled by the withCredentials attribute.
For a request that includes credentials, browsers won’t let your frontend JavaScript code access the response if the value of the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header is *. Instead the value in that case must exactly match your frontend code’s origin, http://127.0.0.1:3000.
See Credentialed requests and wildcards in the MDN HTTP access control (CORS) article.
If you control the server you’re sending the request to, then a common way to deal with this case is to configure the server to take the value of the Origin request header, and echo/reflect that back into the value of the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header. For example, with nginx:
add_header Access-Control-Allow-Origin $http_origin
But that’s just one example; other (web) server systems provide similar ways to echo origin values.

I am using Chrome. I also tried using that Chrome CORS Plugin
That Chrome CORS plugin apparently just simplemindedly injects an Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * header into the response the browser sees. If the plugin were smarter, what it would be doing is setting the value of that fake Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to the actual origin of your frontend JavaScript code, http://127.0.0.1:3000.
So avoid using that plugin, even for testing. It’s just a distraction. If you want to test what responses you get from the server with no browser filtering them, you’re better off using curl -H as above.

As far as the frontend JavaScript code for the fetch(…) request in the question:
headers.append('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', 'http://localhost:3000');
headers.append('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', 'true');
Remove those lines. The Access-Control-Allow-* headers are response headers. You never want to send them in a request. The only effect that’ll have is to trigger a browser to do a preflight.